Paper detail

The Gamma-Ray Burst Hubble Diagram and Its Cosmological Implications

In this paper, we continue to build support for the proposal to use gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) as standard candles in constructing the Hubble Diagram at redshifts beyond the current reach of Type Ia supernova observations. We confirm that correlations among certain spectral and lightcurve features can indeed be used as luminosity indicators, and demonstrate from the most up-to-date GRB sample appropriate for this work that the $Λ$CDM model optimized with these data is characterized by parameter values consistent with those in the concordance model. Specifically, we find that $(Ω_m,Ω_Λ)\approx (0.25_{-0.06}^{+0.05}, 0.75_{-0.05}^{+0.06})$, which are consistent, to within $1σ$, with $(0.29,0.71)$ obtained from the 9-yr WMAP data. We also carry out a comparative analysis between $Λ$CDM and the $R_{\rm h}=ct$ Universe and find that the optimal $Λ$CDM model fits the GRB Hubble Diagram with a reduced $χ^2_{\rm dof}\approx 2.26$, whereas the fit using $R_{\rm h}=ct$ results in a $χ^2_{\rm dof}\approx 2.14$. In both cases, about 20% of the events lie at least $2σ$ away from the best-fit curves, suggesting that either some contamination by non-standard GRB luminosities is unavoidable, or that the errors and intrinsic scatter associated with the data are being underestimated. With these optimized fits, we use three statistical tools---the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the Kullback Information Criterion (KIC), and the Bayes Information Criterion (BIC)---to show that, based on the GRB Hubble Diagram, the likelihood of $R_{\rm h}=ct$ being closer to the correct model is $\sim 85-96%$, compared to $\sim 4-15%$ for $Λ$CDM.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.