Paper detail

The Gamma-Ray Background Constrains the Origins of the Radio and X-Ray Backgrounds

Cosmic ray protons generate gamma-rays, neutrinos, and secondary electrons and positrons (e+/-) through pion-producing collisions with gas atoms. Any synchrotron or Inverse Compton (IC) radiation from secondary e+/- is therefore accompanied by pionic gamma-rays. Using the extragalactic gamma-ray background, we constrain the contribution of secondary e+/- to the cosmic radio, X-ray, and soft gamma-ray backgrounds. These bounds depend on the unknown hadronic contribution to the gamma-ray background and the backgrounds' source redshifts. With our assumptions, we find that IC-upscattered light from secondaries is <~ 1/4 of the MeV - GeV gamma-ray background and <~ 10% of the 0.5 keV - 1 MeV background (for sources at a redshift z <~ 10). The low intensity of the observed gamma-ray background is marginally inconsistent with a secondary e+/- origin for the radio background reported by ARCADE at ~3 GHz, unless the magnetic field strength in their sources is milliGauss or greater. These limits on the magnetic field strength are sensitive to uncertainties. However, any contribution to the gamma-ray background from sources not responsible for the ARCADE excess increases the inconsistency.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.