Paper detail

The gamma = 100 Beta-Beam revisited

We study the performance of gamma = 100 Beta-Beam setups based on the decays of 8B and 8Li as a function of the achievable production fluxes and compare them with the standard setups based on 18Ne and 6He decays. For the standard setup we also investigate the physics potential for reduced 18Ne fluxes, since it seems experimentally challenging to achieve the baseline numbers. We find that, contrary to the standard setup, setups based in 8B and 8Li can be sensitive to the mass hierarchy down to values of sin^2 2theta_{13} > 10^-2 by themselves, due to the stronger matter effects granted by the higher energy of the neutrinos. On the other hand, the longer baseline required for neutrinos to oscillate at these higher energies reduces the statistics at the detector and fluxes around three times larger are required to reach the sensitivity to theta_{13} and CP violation for the smallest values of sin^2 2theta_{13} that the standard setup provides. We also studied the required suppression factor of the atmospheric background. In all the setups studied, we found that a suppression factor of 10^-4 is equivalent to removing completely the atmospheric background. Suppression factors of order 10^-3 do not imply a significant loss in sensitivity while suppressions of 10^-2 still allow good CP discovery potential if sin^2 2theta_{13} > 10^-2 and the flux is not too low.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.