Paper detail

The galaxy stellar mass-star formation rate relation: Evidence for an evolving stellar initial mass function?

The evolution of the galaxy stellar mass--star formation rate relationship (M*-SFR) provides key constraints on the stellar mass assembly histories of galaxies. For star-forming galaxies, M*-SFR is observed to be fairly tight with a slope close to unity from z~0-2. Simulations of galaxy formation reproduce these trends owing to the generic dominance of smooth and steady cold accretion in these systems. In contrast, the amplitude of the M*-SFR relation evolves markedly differently than in models. Stated in terms of a star formation activity parameter alpha=(M*/SFR)/(t_H-1 Gyr), models predict a constant alpha~1 out to redshifts z=4+, while the observed M*-SFR relation indicates that alpha increases by X3 from z~2 until today. The low alpha at high-z not only conflicts with models, but is also difficult to reconcile with other observations of high-z galaxies. Systematic biases could significantly affect measurements of M* and SFR, but detailed considerations suggest that none are obvious candidates to reconcile the discrepancy. A speculative solution is considered in which the stellar initial mass function (IMF) evolves towards more high-mass star formation at earlier epochs. Following Larson, a model is investigated in which the characteristic mass Mhat where the IMF turns over increases with redshift. The observed and predicted M*-SFR evolution may be brought into agreement if Mhat=0.5(1+z)^2 Mo out to z~2. Such evolution broadly matches recent observations of cosmic stellar mass growth, and the resulting z=0 cumulative IMF is similar to the paunchy IMF favored by Fardal et al to reconcile the observed cosmic star formation history with present-day fossil light measures. [abridged]

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.