Paper detail

The Galaxy-Halo/Subhalo connection: Mass relations and implications for some satellite occupational distributions

We infer the local stellar-to-halo/subhalo mass relations (MRs) for central and satellite galaxies separately. We constraint this relations by using several combinations of observational data, consisting of the total galaxy stellar mass function, its decomposition into centrals and satellites, and the projected two-point correlation functions measured in different stellar mass bins. The differences among the resulting MRs are within the model-fit uncertainties (which are very small, smaller than the intrinsic scatter between galaxy and halo mass), no matter what combination of data are used. We also constrain the values of the intrinsic scatter around the central-halo (CH) and satellite-subhalo (SS) MRs assuming them to be constant: sigma_c= 0.168+-0.051 dex and sigma_s = 0.172+-0.057 dex, respectively. The CH and SS MRs are actually different, in particular when we take the subhalo mass at the present-day epoch instead of at their accretion time. We calculate several population statistics. We find that the central galaxy is not on average within the mass distribution of the most-massive satellite, even for cluster-sized halos, i.e., centrals are not a mere realization of the high-end of the satellite mass function; however for > 3x10^13 msun halos, ~15% of centrals could be. We also find that the probabilities of MW-sized halos of having N Magellanic-Clouds (MCs)-sized satellites agree well with observational measures; for a halo mass of 2x10^12 msun, the probability to have 2 MCs is 5.4%, but if we exclude those systems with satellites larger than the MCs, then the probability decreases to <2.2%.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.