Paper detail

The galaxy cluster concentration-mass relation in dark energy cosmologies

We use numerical simulations of different dark energy cosmologies to investigate the concentration-mass (c-M) relation in galaxy clusters. In particular, we consider a reference Lambda cold dark matter (LambdaCDM) model, two models with dynamical dark energy, viewed as a quintessence scalar field [using a Ratra and Peebles (RP) and a supergravity (SUGRA) potential form], and two extended quintessence models, one with positive and one with negative coupling (EQp and EQn respectively), where the quintessence scalar field interacts non-minimally with gravity (scalar-tensor theories). All the models are normalized in order to match CMB data from Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 3 (WMAP3). [Abridged] We consider both the complete catalog of clusters and groups and a subsample of relaxed objects. The c-M relation of our reference LambdaCDM model is in good agreement with the results in literature, and relaxed objects have a higher normalization and a shallower slope with respect to the complete sample. For the different dark energy models, we find that for LambdaCDM, RP and SUGRA the normalization of the c-M relation is linked to the growth factor D+ and the power spectrum normalization sigma8, with models having a higher value of sigma8 D+ having also a higher normalization. This simple scheme is no longer valid for EQp and EQn because in these models it is present a time dependent effective gravitational interaction, whose redshift evolution depends on the sign of the coupling. This leads to a decrease (increase) of the expected normalization in the EQp (EQn) model. This result shows a direct manifestation of the coupling between gravity and the quintessence scalar field characterizing EQ models that cannot be seen at the background level but can be investigated in the non-linear regime.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.