Paper detail

The Galactic Center Cloud G2 -- a Young Low-Mass Star with a Stellar Wind

We explore the possibility that the G2 gas cloud falling in towards \sgra is the mass loss envelope of a young TTauri star. As the star plunges to smaller radius at 1000 to 6000 \kms, a strong bow shock forms where the stellar wind is impacted by the hot X-ray emitting gas in the vicinity of \sgra. For a stellar mass loss rate of $4\times10^{-8}$ \msun per yr and wind velocity 100 \kms, the bow shock will have an emission measure ($EM = n^2 vol$) at a distance $\sim10^{16}$ cm, similar to that inferred from the IR emission lines. The ionization of the dense bow shock gas is potentially provided by collisional ionization at the shock front and cooling radiation (X-ray and UV) from the post shock gas. The former would predict a constant line flux as a function of distance from \sgra, while the latter will have increasing emission at lesser distances. In this model, the star and its mass loss wind should survive pericenter passage since the wind is likely launched at 0.2 AU and this is much less than the Roche radius at pericenter ($\sim3$ AU for a stellar mass of 2\msun). In this model, the emission cloud will probably survive pericenter passage, discriminating this scenario from others.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.