Paper detail

The galactic center arc as source of high-energy gamma-rays

We discuss the radio {\it arc} at the galactic center to be the counterpart of the high-energy \gr source 2EG J1746-2852. The observed \gr flux is constant within the statistical limits and the spectrum is very hard. The lack of variability makes it highly unlikely that any of the compact sources in the vicinity of the Galactic Center is the counterpart of 2EG J1746-2852. This includes the peculiar source Sgr A$^\ast$ at the very center of the Galaxy, which is often discussed to harbour a black hole of $10^6\, M_\odot$. Existing radio data on the {\it arc} support the view that its synchrotron emission originates from cooling, initially monoenergetic electrons which diffuse and convect from their sources to the outer extensions of the {\it arc}. If the source of high-energy electrons coincides with the sickle region (G0.18-0.04), as indicated by the radio data, then the ambient far- infrared photons can be up-scattered to \grs by inverse-Compton inter- action with the young high-energy electrons. We solve the continuity equation for the electrons including terms for diffusion, convection, monoenergetic injection, and the full energy loss. We show that both the flux and the spectrum of 2EG J1746-2852 can be well explained.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.