Paper detail

The Fundamental Plane Relation for Gamma-Ray Pulsars Implied by 4FGL

We explore the validity of the recently reported fundamental plane (FP) relation of gamma-ray pulsars using 190 pulsars included in the latest 4FGL-DR3 catalog. This sample number is more than twice as large as that of the original study. The FP relation incorporates 4 parameters, i.e., the spin-down power, $\dot{\mathcal{E}}$, the surface magnetic field, $B_{\star}$, the total gamma-ray luminosity, $L_γ$, and a spectral cutoff energy, $ε_{\rm cut}$. The derivation of $ε_{\rm cut}$ is the most intriguing one because $ε_{\rm cut}$ depends on the proper interpretation of the available phase-averaged spectra. We construct synthetic phase-averaged spectra, guided by the few existing phase-resolved ones, to find that the best fit cutoff energy, $ε_{\rm c1}$, corresponding to a purely exponential cutoff (plus a power law) spectral form, is the parameter that optimally probes the maximum cutoff energy of the emission that originates from the core of the dissipative region, i.e., the equatorial current sheet. Computing this parameter for the 190 4FGL pulsars, we find that the resulting FP relation, i.e. the gamma-ray luminosity in terms of the other observables, reads $L_γ=10^{14.3\pm 1.3}(ε_{\rm c1}/{\rm MeV})^{1.39\pm0.17}(B_{\star}/{\rm G})^{0.12\pm 0.03}(\dot{\mathcal{E}}/{\rm erg\;s^{-1}})^{0.39\pm 0.05}{\rm ~erg\;s^{-1}}$; this is in good agreement with both the empirical relation reported by Kalapotharakos et al. (2019) and the theoretically predicted relation for curvature radiation. Finally, we revisit the radiation reaction limited condition, to find it is a sufficient but not necessary condition for the theoretical derivation of the FP relation. However, the assumption of the radiation reaction limited acceleration reveals the underlying accelerating electric field component and its scaling with $\dot{\mathcal{E}}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.