Paper detail

The Fundamental Plane at z=1.27: First Calibration of the Mass Scale of Red Galaxies at Redshifts z>1

We present results on the Fundamental Plane (FP) of early-type galaxies in the cluster RDCS J0848+4453 at z=1.27. Internal velocity dispersions of three K-selected early-type galaxies are determined from deep Keck spectra. Structural parameters are determined from HST NICMOS images. The galaxies show substantial offsets from the FP of the nearby Coma cluster, as expected from passive evolution of their stellar populations. The offsets from the FP can be expressed as offsets in M/L ratio. The M/L ratios of the two most massive galaxies are consistent with an extrapolation of results obtained at z=0.02-0.83. The evolution of early-type galaxies with masses >10^11 M_sun is well described by ln M/L(B) = (-1.06 +- 0.09) z, corresponding to passive evolution of -1.50 +- 0.13 mag at z=1.3. Ignoring selection effects, the best fitting stellar formation redshift is z*=2.6, corresponding to a luminosity weighted age at the epoch of observation of ~2 Gyr. The M/L ratios of these two galaxies are also in excellent agreement with predictions from models that include progenitor bias. The third galaxy is a factor ~10 less massive than the other two, shows strong Balmer absorption lines in its spectrum, and is offset from the Coma Fundamental Plane by 2.9 mag in rest-frame B. Despite their large range in M/L ratios, all three galaxies fall in the ``Extremely Red Object'' (ERO) class with I-H>3 and R-K>5, and our results show that it is hazardous to use simple models for converting luminosity to mass for these objects. Measurements of M/L ratios at high redshift can be considered first steps to empirically disentangle luminosity and mass evolution at the high mass end of the galaxy population, lifting an important degeneracy in the interpretation of evolution of the luminosity function. [SHORTENED]

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.