Paper detail

The Frequency and Radio Properties of Broad Absorption Line Quasars

A sample of 67 Broad Absorption Line quasars (BALQSOs) from the Large Bright Quasar Survey (LBQS) is used to estimate the observed and intrinsic fraction of BAL quasars in optically--selected samples at intermediate (B_J \simeq 18.5) magnitudes. The observed BALQSO fraction in the redshift range 1.5 < z < 3.0 is 15\pm3%. A well--determined, empirical, k--correction, to allow for the differences in the spectral energy distributions of non--BALQSOs and BALQSOs shortward of \simeq 2100A in the restframe, is applied to the sample. The result is an estimate of the intrinsic fraction of BALQSOs, in the redshift range 1.5 < z < 3.0, of 22+/-4%. This value is twice that commonly cited for the occurrence of BALQSOs in optically--selected samples and the figure is in reasonable agreement with that from a preliminary analysis of the SDSS Early Data Release. The fraction of BALQSOs predicted to be present in an optical survey with flux limits equivalent to that of the FIRST Bright Quasar Survey (FBQS) is shown to be \simeq 20%. The BALQSO fractions derived from the FBQS and the LBQS suggest that optically--bright BALQSOs are half as likely as non-BALQSOs to be detectable as S_1.4GHz > 1mJy radio sources.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.