Paper detail

The Fraction of Gamma-ray Bursts with an Observed Photospheric Emission Episode

There is no complete description of the emission physics during the prompt phase in gamma-ray bursts. Spectral analyses, however, indicate that many spectra are narrower than what is expected for non-thermal emission models. Here, we reanalyse the sample of 37 bursts in \citet{Yu2019}, by fitting the narrowest time-resolved spectrum in each burst. We perform model comparison between a photospheric and a synchrotron emission model based on Bayesian evidence. We choose to compare the shape of the narrowest expected spectra: emission from the photosphere in a non-dissipative flow and slow-cooled synchrotron emission from a narrow electron distribution. We find that the photospheric spectral shape is preferred by $54 \pm 8 \%$ of the spectra (20/37), while $38 \pm 8 \%$ of the spectra (14/37) prefer the synchrotron spectral shape; three spectra are inconclusive. We hence conclude that GRB spectra are indeed very narrow and that more than half of the bursts have a photospheric emission episode. We also find that a third of all analysed spectra, not only prefer, but are also compatible with a non-dissipative photosphere, confirming previous similar findings. Furthermore, we notice that the spectra, that prefer the photospheric model, all have a low-energy power-law indices $α> -0.5$. This means that $α$ is a good estimator of which model is preferred by the data. Finally, we argue that the spectra which statistically prefer the synchrotron model, could equally well be caused by subphotospheric dissipation. If that is the case, photospheric emission during the early, prompt phase would be even more dominant.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.