Abstract

The FourStar galaxy evolution survey (ZFOURGE) is a 45 night legacy program with the FourStar near-infrared camera on Magellan and one of the most sensitive surveys to date. ZFOURGE covers a total of 400 arcmin2400\ \mathrm{arcmin}^2 in cosmic fields CDFS, COSMOS and UDS, overlapping CANDELS. We present photometric catalogs comprising >70,000>70,000 galaxies, selected from ultradeep KsK_s-band detection images (25.5−26.525.5-26.5 AB mag, 5σ5σ, total), and >80%>80\% complete to Ks<25.3−25.9K_s<25.3-25.9 AB. We use 5 near-IR medium-bandwidth filters (J1,J2,J3,Hs,HlJ_1,J_2,J_3,H_s,H_l) as well as broad-band KsK_s at 1.05 −2.16 μm1.05\ - 2.16\ μm to 25−2625-26 AB at a seeing of ∼0.5\sim0.5". Each field has ancillary imaging in 26−4026-40 filters at 0.3−8 μm0.3-8\ μm. We derive photometric redshifts and stellar population properties. Comparing with spectroscopic redshifts indicates a photometric redshift uncertainty σz=0.010,0.009σ_z={0.010,0.009}, and 0.011 in CDFS, COSMOS, and UDS. As spectroscopic samples are often biased towards bright and blue sources, we also inspect the photometric redshift differences between close pairs of galaxies, finding σz,pairs=0.01−0.02σ_{z,pairs}= 0.01-0.02 at 1<z<2.51<z<2.5. We quantify how σz,pairsσ_{z,pairs} depends on redshift, magnitude, SED type, and the inclusion of FourStar medium bands. σz,pairsσ_{z,pairs} is smallest for bright, blue star-forming samples, while red star-forming galaxies have the worst σz,pairsσ_{z,pairs}. Including FourStar medium bands reduces σz,pairsσ_{z,pairs} by 50\% at 1.5<z<2.51.5<z<2.5. We calculate SFRs based on ultraviolet and ultradeep far-IR SpitzerSpitzer/MIPS and Herschel/PACS data. We derive rest-frame U−VU-V and V−JV-J colors, and illustrate how these correlate with specific SFR and dust emission to z=3.5z=3.5. We confirm the existence of quiescent galaxies at z∼3z\sim3, demonstrating their SFRs are suppressed by >×15>\times15.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.