Paper detail

The formation of the stripped envelope type II b Supernova progenitors: Rotation, Metallicity and Overshooting

Type IIb supernovae are believed to originate from core-collapse progenitors having kept only a very thin hydrogen envelope. We aim to explore how some physical factors, such as rotation, metallicity, overshooting, and the initial orbital period in binaries, significantly affect the Roche lobe overflow and the formation of type IIb supernovae. It is found that binaries are the main channel that capable of producing type typeIIb supernovae progenitors in the mass range for initial masses below 20 $M_{\odot}$. The formation of type IIb supernova progenitors is extremely sensitive to the initial orbital period. A less massive hydrogen indicates smaller radius and a higher effective temperatures, and vice versa. Binary systems with initial periods between 300 and 720 days produce type IIb progenitors that are a red supergiant. Those with an initial period between 50 and 300 days produce yellow supergiant progenitors and those with initial periods shorter than 50 days, blue supergiant progenitors. Both rapid rotation and larger overshooting can enlarge the carbon-oxygen core mass and lead to higher core temperature and lower central density at the pre-collapse phase. They are also beneficial to surface nitrogen enrichment but restrict the efficiency of the first dredge-up. SN IIb progenitors with low metallicity have smaller hydrogen envelope masses and radii than the high metallicity counterparts. Ultra-stripped binary models have systematically higher core mass fraction $\rm ^{12}C$ left, which has important influence on the compactness of type IIb progenitors.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.