Paper detail

The Formation of Super-Earths and Mini-Neptunes with Giant Impacts

The majority of discovered exoplanetary systems harbour a new class of planets, bodies typically several times more massive than Earth but orbiting their host stars well inside the orbit of Mercury. The origin of these close-in super-Earths and mini-Neptunes is a major unanswered question in planet formation. Unlike Earth, whose atmosphere contains $<10^{-6}$ its total mass, a large fraction of close-in planets have significant gaseous envelopes, containing $1 -10\%$ or more of their total mass. It has been proposed that these close-in planets formed in situ either by delivery of $50-100M_{\oplus}$ of rocky material to the inner disc, or in a disc enhanced relative to the MMSN. In both cases, final assembly of the planets occurs by giant impacts (GIs). Here we test the viability of these scenarios. We show that atmospheres accreted by isolation masses are small ($10^{-3}-10^{-2}$ the core mass) and that atmospheric mass-loss during GIs is significant, with typical post-GI atmospheres that are $8 \times 10^{-4}$ the core mass. Such values are consistent with terrestrial planet atmospheres but more than an order of magnitude below atmospheric masses of $1-10\%$ inferred for many close-in exoplanets. In the most optimistic scenario with no core luminosity, post-GI envelope accretion from a depleted gas disc yields atmospheric masses that are several per cent the core mass. If the gravitational potential energy due to the last mass doubling of the planet by GIs is released over the disc dissipation time-scale as core luminosity, then envelope masses are reduced by about an order of magnitude. Finally we show that radial drift time-scales due to gas drag for many isolation masses are shorter than typical disc lifetimes. Given these challenges, we conclude that most observed close-in planets with envelopes larger than several per cent likely formed at larger separations from their host stars.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.