Paper detail

The Formation of Bimodal Dust Species in Nova Ejecta

The formation of bimodal dust species (namely the silicate and amorphous carbon dust grains coexistent) in a nova eruption is an open problem. According to the nova model simulated by Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics code, we calculate the formation and growth of carbon (C) and forsterite (Mg2SiO4) dust grains purely in nova ejecta for the fee-expansion model and the radiative shock model by assuming spherical geometry of the nova ejecta. In these models, the chemical properties of pre-existing circumstellar medium are not taken into account. In the free-expansion model, the nova ejecta is not an idea environment for dust nucleation. However, it can efficiently produce dust in the radiative shock model. We estimate that every nova can produce C grains with an average mass of about $10^{-9}$ and $10^{-8}$ ${\rm M_\odot}$, and Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains with an average mass of about $10^{-8}$ and $10^{-7}$ ${\rm M_\odot}$. Based on the mass of ejected gas, the ratio of dust to gas is about 1\%. The C grains form first after several or tens of days of nova eruption. After that, the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains begin to grow in tens of days, which is consistent with observations.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.