Paper detail

The Formation and Evolution of Wide-Orbit Stellar Multiples In Magnetized Clouds

Stars rarely form in isolation. Nearly half of the stars in the Milky Way have a companion, and this fraction increases in star-forming regions. However, why some dense cores and filaments form bound pairs while others form single stars remains unclear. We present a set of three-dimensional, gravo-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of turbulent star-forming clouds, aimed at understanding the formation and evolution of multiple-star systems formed through large scale (>~$10^3$ AU) turbulent fragmentation. We investigate three global magnetic field strengths, with global mass-to-flux ratios of $μ_ϕ$=2, 8, and 32. The initial separations of protostars in multiples depends on the global magnetic field strength, with stronger magnetic fields (e.g., $μ_ϕ$=2) suppressing fragmentation on smaller scales. The overall multiplicity fraction (MF) is between 0.4-0.6 for our strong and intermediate magnetic field strengths, which is in agreement with observations. The weak field case has a lower fraction. The MF is relatively constant throughout the simulations, even though stellar densities increase as collapse continues. While the MF rarely exceeds 60% in all three simulations, over 80% of all protostars are part of a binary system at some point. We additionally find that the distribution of binary spin mis-alignment angles is consistent with a randomized distribution. In all three simulations, several binaries originate with wide separations and dynamically evolve to <~ $10^2$ AU separations. We show that a simple model of mass accretion and dynamical friction with the gas can explain this orbital evolution.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.