Paper detail

The Flux Distribution and Sky Density of 25th Magnitude Main Belt Asteroids

Digital tracking enables telescopes to detect asteroids several times fainter than conventional techniques. We describe our optimized methodology to acquire, process, and interpret digital tracking observations, and we apply it to probe the apparent magnitude distribution of main belt asteroids fainter than any previously detected from the ground. All-night integrations with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) yield 95\% completeness at $R$ magnitude 25.0, and useful sensitivity to $R=25.6$ mag when we use an analytical detection model to correct flux overestimation bias. In a single DECam field observed over two nights, we detect a total of 3234 distinct asteroids, of which 3123 are confirmed on both nights. At opposition from the Sun, we find a sky density of $697 \pm 15$ asteroids per square degree brighter than $R = 25.0$ mag, and $1031 \pm 23$ brighter than $R = 25.6$ mag. We agree with published results for the sky density and apparent magnitude distribution of asteroids brighter than $R=23$ mag. For a power law defined by $dN/dR \propto 10^{αR}$, we find marginally acceptable fits with a constant slope $α= 0.28 \pm 0.02$ from $R=20$ to 25.6 mag. Better fits are obtained for a broken power law with $α=0.218 \pm 0.026$ for $R=20$ to 23.5 mag, steepening to $α=0.340 \pm 0.025$ for $R = 23.5$ to 25.6 mag. The constant or steepening power law indicates asteroids fainter than $R = 23.5$ mag are abundant, contrary to some previous claims but consistent with theory.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.