Paper detail

The Flipped SU(5) String Vacua Classification: A Variation Of The SO(10) Breaking Basis Vector

In this paper, an extension of the classification of flipped SU(5) heterotic-string vacua from [1] with a variation of the SO(10) breaking $α$ basis vector is presented. A statistical sampling in the space of $2^{45}$ flipped SU(5) vacua is explored, where $10^{11}$ distinct GGSO projection configurations are scanned in comparison to the $10^{12}$ GGSO distinct coefficients scanned in the space of $2^{44}$ vacua in [1]. A JAVA code, akin to the one used for the classification in [1], was implemented to explore these. Results presented here indicate that no three generation exophobic vacua exist, which was also found to be the case in [1] as all odd generations were projected out. This paper will also study the details on the comparison between the two classifications achieved and then reflect on future directions in the quest for finding three generation exophobic flipped SU(5) heterotic-string models.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.