Paper detail

The Flattening of Dust Attenuation Curve to z=2.5

We examine the evolution of dust attenuation curve using a sample of 9504 disk star-forming galaxies (SFGs) selected from the CANDELS and 3D-HST surveys and a new technique relying on the fact that disk SFGs of similar stellar masses at the same cosmic epoch are statistically identical in stellar populations. We attribute the discrepancy in median magnitude between face-on (b/a>0.7) and edge-on (b/a<=0.4) subsamples solely to dust attenuation, and obtain the average attenuation in the rest-frame UV and optical as functions of stellar mass and redshift out to z=2.5. Our results show that the attenuation curve becomes remarkably flatter at increasing redshift for both massive and low-mass disk SFGs, and remains likely unchanged with galaxy stellar mass at a fixed epoch within uncertainties. Compared with the Calzetti law, our dust attenuation curves appear to be slightly steeper at 0.5<z<1.4 and remarkably flatter at 1.4<z<2.5. Our findings are consistent with a picture in which the evolution of dust grain size distribution is mainly responsible for the evolution of the dust attenuation curve in SFGs; dust shattering becomes a dominant process at z<~1.4, resulting in an enrichment of small dust grains and consequently a steeper attenuation curve. We stress that extinction correction for high-z galaxies should be done using mass- and redshift-dependent attenuation curves.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.