Paper detail

The first (nearly) model-independent constraint on the neutral hydrogen fraction at z~5--6

Cosmic reionization is expected to be complex, extended and very inhomogeneous. Existing constraints at z~6 on the volume-averaged neutral hydrogen fraction, <x_HI>, are highly model-dependent and controversial. Constraints at z<6, suggesting that the Universe is highly ionized, are also model-dependent, but more fundamentally are invalid in the context of inhomogeneous reionization. As such, it has recently been pointed out that there is no conclusive evidence that reionization has completed by z~5--6, a fact that has important ramifications on the interpretation of high-redshift observations and theoretical models. We present the first direct upper limits on <x_HI> at z~5--6 using the simple and robust statistic of the covering fraction of dark pixels in the Ly alpha/beta forests of high redshift quasars. With a sample of 13 Keck ESI spectra we constrain <x_HI> < 0.2 at 5 < z < 5.5, rising to <x_HI> < 0.8 at z~6.1. We also find tentative evidence for a break in the redshift evolution of the dark covering fraction at z~5.5. A subsample of two deep spectra provides a more stringent constraint of <x_HI>(z=6.1) < 0.5 when combined with conservative estimates of cosmic variance. This upper limit is comparable to existing results at z~6 but is more robust. The results presented here do not rely on assumptions about the quasar continuum, IGM density, HII morphology or ionizing background fields, and thus are a good starting point for future interpretation of high redshift observations.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.