Paper detail

The first low-mass stars: critical metallicity or dust-to-gas ratio?

We explore the minimal conditions which enable the formation of metal-enriched solar and sub-solar mass stars. We find that in the absence of dust grains, gas fragmentation occurs at densities nH ~ [10^4-10^5]cm^{-3} when the metallicity exceeds Z ~ 10^{-4} Zsun. The resulting fragmentation masses are > 10 Msun. The inclusion of Fe and Si cooling does not affect the thermal evolution as this is dominated by molecular cooling even for metallicities as large as Z = 10^{-2} Zsun. The presence of dust is the key driver for the formation of low-mass stars. We focus on three representative core-collapse supernova (SN) progenitors, and consider the effects of reverse shocks of increasing strength: these reduce the depletion factors, fdep = Mdust/(Mdust+Mmet), alter the shape of the grain size distribution function and modify the relative abundances of grain species and of metal species in the gas phase. We find that the lowest metallicity at which fragmentation occurs is Z=10^{-6} Zsun for gas pre-enriched by the explosion of a 20 Msun primordial SN (fdep > 0.22) and/or by a 35 Msun, Z=10^{-4} Zsun SN (fdep > 0.26); it is ~ 1 dex larger, when the gas is pre-enriched by a Z = 10^{-4} Zsun, 20 Msun SN (fdep > 0.04). Cloud fragmentation depends on the depletion factor and it is suppressed when the reverse shock leads to a too large destruction of dust grains. These features are all consistent with the existence of a minimum dust-to-gas ratio, Dcr, above which fragmentation is activated. We derive a simple analytic expression for Dcr which, for grain composition and properties explored in the present study, reads Dcr = [2.6 - 6.3] x 10^{-9}. When the dust-to-gas ratio of star forming clouds exceeds this value, the fragmentation masses range between 0.01 Msun and 1 Msun, thus enabling the formation of the first low-mass stars.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.