Paper detail

The First Galaxies: Signatures of the Initial Starburst

Detection of the radiation emitted from the first galaxies at z > 10 will be made possible in the next decade, with the launch of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). We carry out cosmological radiation hydrodynamics simulations of Population III (Pop III) starbursts in a 10^8 M_Sun dwarf galaxy at z = 12.5. For different star formation efficiencies and stellar initial mass functions (IMFs), we calculate the luminosities and equivalent widths (EWs) of the recombination lines H_alpha, Ly_alpha, and He II 1640, under the simple assumption that the stellar population does not evolve over the first ~3 Myr of the starburst. Although only < 40 percent of the gas in the central 100 pc of the galaxy is photoionized, we find that photoheating by massive stars causes a strong dynamical response, which results in a weak correlation between luminosity emitted in hydrogen recombination lines and the total mass in stars. However, owing to the low escape fraction of He II-ionizing photons, the luminosity emitted in He II 1640 is much more strongly correlated with the total stellar mass. The ratio of the luminosity in He II 1640 to that in Ly_alpha or H_alpha is found to be a good indicator of the IMF in many cases. The ratio of observable fluxes is F_1640/F_Halpha ~ 1 for clusters of 100 M_Sun Pop III stars and F_1640/F_Halpha ~ 0.1 for clusters of 25 M_Sun Pop III stars. The EW of the He II 1640 emission line is the most reliable IMF indicator, its value varying between ~ 20 and ~ 200 angstrom for a massive and very massive Pop III IMF, respectively. Even the bright, initial stages of Pop III starbursts in the first dwarf galaxies will likely not be directly detectable by the JWST. Instead, the JWST may discover only more massive, and hence more chemically evolved, galaxies which host normal, Pop I/II, star formation.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.