Paper detail

The Field-Theoretic Approach in General Relativity and Other Metric Theories. A Review

GR and other metric theories of gravity are formulated with an arbitrary auxiliary curved background in a Lagrangian formalism. A new sketch of how to include spinor fields is included. Conserved quantities are obtained using Noether's theorem and expressed as divergences of antisymmetric densities, connecting local perturbations with quasi-local conserved quantities. The background's arbitrariness matches the so-called non-localizability of gravitational energy (infinity of localizations). The formalism has two partly overlapping uses: practical applications of pure GR (with fictitious background) and foundational considerations in which background causality facilitates quantization. The Schwarzschild solution is a primary application. Various possibilities for calculating the mass using surface integration are given. A field-theoretic curved spacetime is given from spatial infinity to the horizon and even to the true singularity. Trajectories of test particles in the Schwarzschild geometry are gauge-dependent in that even breakdowns at the horizon can be suppressed (or generated) by naive gauge transformations. This fact illustrates the auxiliary nature of the background metric and the need for some notion of maximal extension---much as with coordinate transformations in geometric GR. A continuous collapse to a point mass in the field-theoretic framework is given. The field-theoretic method is generalized to arbitrary metric theories in $D$ dimensions. The results are developed in the framework of Lovelock gravity and applied to calculate masses of Schwarzschild-like black holes. The bimetric formalism makes it natural to consider a graviton mass. Babak and Grishchuk's numerical and hence nonperturbative work sheds light on questions of a (dis)continuous massless limit for massive pure spin-2 and the classical (in)stability of spin-2/spin-0 theory.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.