Paper detail

The field of NGC 6397 as a test for Galactic models

Taking advantage of recent HST data for field stars in the region of the Galactic globular cluster NGC 6397, we tested the predictions of several Galactic models with star counts reaching a largely unexplored range of magnitudes, down to $V$$\sim$ 26.5. After updating the input stellar ($V-I$) colors, we found that the two-component Bahcall-Soneira (B&S) model can be put in satisfactory agreement with observations for suitable choices of disk/spheroid luminosity functions. However if one assumes the Gould, Bahcall and Flynn (1996, 1997) disk luminosity function (LF) together with the Gould, Flynn and Bahcall (1998) spheroid LF, there is no way to reconcile the predicted and observed $V $-magnitude distribution. We also analysed the agreement between observed and predicted magnitude and color distributions for two selected models with a thick disk component. Even in this case there are suitable combinations of model parameters and faint magnitude LFs which can give a reasonable agreement with observational star counts both in magnitude and in color, the above quoted combination of Gould et al. (1997, 1998) LFs giving again predictions in clear disagreement with observations.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.