Paper detail

The fate of supernova remnants near quiescent supermassive black holes

There is mounting observational evidence that most galactic nuclei host both supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and young populations of stars. With an abundance of massive stars, core-collapse supernovae are expected in SMBH spheres of influence. We develop a novel numerical method, based on the Kompaneets approximation, to trace supernova remnant (SNR) evolution in these hostile environments, where radial gas gradients and SMBH tides are present. We trace the adiabatic evolution of the SNR shock until 50% of the remnant is either in the radiative phase or is slowed down below the SMBH Keplerian velocity and is sheared apart. In this way, we obtain shapes and lifetimes of SNRs as a function of the explosion distance from the SMBH, the gas density profile and the SMBH mass. As an application, we focus here exclusively on quiescent SMBHs, because their light may not hamper detections of SNRs and because we can take advantage of the unsurpassed detailed observations of our Galactic Centre. Assuming that properties such as gas and stellar content scale appropriately with the SMBH mass, we study SNR evolution around other quiescent SMBHs. We find that, for SMBH masses over ~10^7 Msun, tidal disruption of SNRs can occur at less than 10^4 yr, leading to a shortened X-ray emitting adiabatic phase, and to no radiative phase. On the other hand, only modest disruption is expected in our Galactic Centre for SNRs in their X-ray stage. This is in accordance with estimates of the lifetime of the Sgr A East SNR, which leads us to expect one supernova per 10^4 yr in the sphere of influence of Sgr A*.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.