Paper detail

The Faint End of the Galaxy Luminosity Function In Moderate Redshift Clusters

We present deep two-colour photometry of two rich clusters at z=0.18, A665 and A1689. We use these data to construct number counts as a function of magnitude in the two fields. By combining these counts with similar observations from a large area field survey we subtract the field contamination statistically to produce luminosity functions for the two clusters. Great care has been taken to achieve agreement between the photometry of these two samples. The cluster data are complete to a limiting magnitude of I=22.5 or an absolute magnitude in the cluster of I= -18.0 ($M^\star+5$). The luminosity functions of both clusters are well described by a Gaussian function for the bright galaxies, combined with a Schechter function at the faint end, similar to that required to fit the luminosity function in local clusters. The slope at the faint end of the Schechter function in both clusters is extremely steep in V, alpha ~ -2. A shallower slope is seen to the limit of the I data, indicating that the cluster population is rapidly blueing as we reach fainter. The excellent agreement between the form of the luminosity function in our two distant clusters, as well as agreement with the luminosity function given by Driver et al (1994) for a single z=0.21 cluster, indicates that this faint blue population is a general constituent of distant clusters. We compare our results with those from studies of local clusters. Depending upon the degree of fading (or disruption) of these faint blue galaxies,we tentatively identify their remnants with the low surface brightness dwarf galaxies which are the dominant population in local clusters. We discuss the possible role of this population as the source of most of the X-ray gas in rich clusters.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.