Paper detail

The Failure Probability at Sink Node of Random Linear Network Coding

In practice, since many communication networks are huge in scale or complicated in structure even dynamic, the predesigned network codes based on the network topology is impossible even if the topological structure is known. Therefore, random linear network coding was proposed as an acceptable coding technique. In this paper, we further study the performance of random linear network coding by analyzing the failure probabilities at sink node for different knowledge of network topology and get some tight and asymptotically tight upper bounds of the failure probabilities. In particular, the worst cases are indicated for these bounds. Furthermore, if the more information about the network topology is utilized, the better upper bounds are obtained. These bounds improve on the known ones. Finally, we also discuss the lower bound of this failure probability and show that it is also asymptotically tight.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.