Paper detail

The $F$-term Problem and other Challenges of Stringy Quintessence

We attempt a systematic analysis of string-theoretic quintessence models as an alternative to metastable de Sitter vacua. It appears that, within the boundaries of what is known, large-volume type-IIB flux compactifications are preferred. Here the quintessence scalar is the ratio of certain 4-cycle volumes. It has already been noticed that the volume modulus, which must be stabilized, tends to remain too light. One may call this the "light volume problem". In addition, we identify an "$F$-term problem": The positive energy density of standard-model SUSY breaking is higher than the depth of all known negative contributions. We discuss what it would take to resolve these issues and comment on partially related challenges for axionic quintessence. In particular, large cancellations between positive and negative potential terms appear unavoidable in general. As a further challenge, one should then explain why a small de-tuning cannot be used to uplift into a deep slow-roll regime, violating de Sitter swampland conjectures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.