Paper detail

The Extended Starformation History of the First Generation of Stars, and the Reionization of Cosmic Hydrogen

Population-III (Pop-III) starformation (SF) is thought to be quenched when the metallicity of the star-forming gas reaches a critical level. At high z, when the general intergalactic medium (IGM) was enriched with metals, the fraction of primordial gas already collapsed in minihalos was significantly larger than the fraction of primordial gas that had already been involved in Pop-III SF. We argue that this minihalo gas remained largely in a metal-free state, until these minihalos merged into large systems and formed stars. As a result, the era of Pop-III SF was significantly prolonged, leading to an integrated Pop-III SF an order of magnitude larger than expected for an abrupt transition redshift. The contribution of Pop-III SF to the reionization of hydrogen could have been significant until z~10 and may have extended to z~6. Our modeling allows for gradual enrichment of the IGM, feedback from photo-ionization and screening of reionization by minihalos. Nevertheless, extended Pop-III SF can result in complex, multi-peaked reionization histories. The contribution of Pop-III stars to reionization will be tested by the three-year WMAP results: (1) if Pop-III stars do not contribute to reionization, tau_es<0.05-0.06 and a rapid reionization at z~6 is expected; (2) if the product of star formation efficiency and escape fraction for Pop-III stars is significantly larger than for Pop-II stars, then a maximum tau_es=0.21 is achievable; (3) in a scenario where the product of star formation efficiency and escape fraction for Pop-III stars is comparable to that for Pop-II stars, tau_es=0.09-0.12 would be observed, with reionization histories characterized by an extended ionization plateau from z=7-12. This result holds regardless of the redshift where the IGM becomes enriched with metals.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.