Paper detail

The Explosion of Helium Stars Evolved With Mass Loss

Light curves, explosion energies, and remnant masses are calculated for a grid of supernovae resulting from massive helium stars that have been evolved including mass loss. These presupernova stars should approximate the results of binary evolution for stars in interacting systems that lose their envelopes close to the time of helium core ignition. Initial helium star masses are in the range 2.5 to 40\,\Msun, which correspond to main sequence masses of about 13 to 90\,\Msun. Common Type Ib and Ic supernovae result from stars whose final masses are approximately 2.5 to 5.6\,\Msun. For heavier stars, a large fraction of collapses lead to black holes, though there is an island of explodability for presupernova masses near 10\,\Msun. The median neutron star mass in binaries is 1.35--1.38\,\Msun \ and the median black hole mass is between 9 and 11\,\Msun. Even though black holes less massive than 5 \Msun\ are rare, they are predicted down to the maximum neutron star mass. There is no empty ``gap'', only a less populated mass range. For standard assumptions regarding the explosions and nucleosynthesis, the models predict light curves that are fainter than the brighter common Type Ib and Ic supernovae. Even with a very liberal, but physically plausible increase in $^{56}$Ni production, the highest energy models are fainter, at peak, than 10$^{42.6}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$, and very few approach that limit. The median peak luminosity ranges from 10$^{42.0}$ to 10$^{42.3}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$. Possible alternatives to the standard neutrino-powered and radioactive-illuminated models are explored. Magnetars are a promising alternative. Several other unusual varieties of Type I supernovae at both high and low mass are explored.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.