Paper detail

The expected number of critical percolation clusters intersecting a line segment

We study critical percolation on a regular planar lattice. Let $E_G(n)$ be the expected number of open clusters intersecting or hitting the line segment $[0,n]$. (For the subscript $G$ we either take $\mathbb{H}$, when we restrict to the upper halfplane, or $\mathbb{C}$, when we consider the full lattice). Cardy (2001) (see also Yu, Saleur and Haas (2008)) derived heuristically that $E_{\mathbb{H}}(n) = An + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4π}\log(n) + o(\log(n))$, where $A$ is some constant. Recently Kovács, Iglói and Cardy (2012) derived heuristically (as a special case of a more general formula) that a similar result holds for $E_{\mathbb{C}}(n)$ with the constant $\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4π}$ replaced by $\frac{5\sqrt{3}}{32π}$. In this paper we give, for site percolation on the triangular lattice, a rigorous proof for the formula of $E_{\mathbb{H}}(n)$ above, and a rigorous upper bound for the prefactor of the logarithm in the formula of $E_{\mathbb{C}}(n)$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.