Paper detail

The Expansion Proper Motions of the Planetary Nebula NGC 6302 from HST imaging

Planetary nebulae expand on time scales of 10^3-10^4 yr. For nearby objects, their expansion can be detected within years to decades. The pattern of expansion probes the internal velocity field and provides clues to the nebula ejection mechanism. In the case of non-symmetric nebulae, and bipolar nebulae in particular, it can also provide information on the development of the morphology. We have measured the expansion proper motions in NGC 6302 from two epochs of HST imaging, separated by 9.43 years. This is used to determine the expansion age and the structure of the velocity field. We use HST images in the [N II] 6583Å filter from HST WF/PC2 and WFC3. The proper motions were obtained for a set of 200 individual tiles within 90" of the central star. The velocity field shows a characteristic linear increase of velocity with radial distance (a so-called Hubble flow). It agrees well with a previous determination by Meaburn et al. (2008), made in a lobe further from the star, which was based on a much longer time span. The pattern of proper motion vectors is mostly radial and the origin is close to the position of the central star directly detected by Szyszka et al. (2009). The results show that the lobes of NGC 6302 were ejected during a brief event 2250 \pm 35yr ago. In the inner regions there is evidence for a subsequent acceleration of the gas by an additional 9.2 km/s, possibly related to the onset of ionization. The dense and massive molecular torus was ejected over 5000yr, ending about 2900yr ago. The lobes were ejected after a short interlude (the 'jet lag') of \sim 600 yr during a brief event. The torus and lobes orig- inate from separate mass-loss events with different physical processes. The delay between the cessation of equatorial mass loss and the ejection of the lobes provides an important constraint for explaining the final mass-loss stages of the progenitor stellar system.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.