Paper detail

The expansion of massive young star clusters - observation meets theory

Most stars form as part of a star cluster. The most massive clusters in the Milky Way exist in two groups - loose and compact clusters - with significantly different sizes at the end of the star formation process. After their formation both types of clusters expand up to a factor 10-20 within the first 20 Myr. Gas expulsion at the end of the star formation process is usually regarded as only possible process that can lead to such an expansion.We investigate the effect of gas expulsion by a direct comparison between numerical models and observed clusters concentrating on clusters with masses >10^3 M(sun). For these clusters the initial conditions before gas expulsion, the characteristic cluster development, its dependence on cluster mass, and the star formation efficiency (SFE) are investigated. We perform N-body simulations of the cluster expansion process after gas expulsion and compare the results with observations. We find that the expansion processes of the observed loose and compact massive clusters are driven by completely different physical processes. As expected the expansion of loose massive clusters is largely driven by the gas loss due to the low SFE of ~30%. One new revelation is that all the observed massive clusters of this group seem to have a very similar size of 1-3 pc at the onset of expansion. It is demonstrated that compact clusters have a much higher effective SFE of 60-70% and are as a result much less affected by gas expulsion. Their expansion is mainly driven by stellar ejections caused by interactions between the cluster members. The reason why ejections are so efficient in driving cluster expansion is that they occur dominantly from the cluster centre and over an extended period of time. Thus during the first 10 Myr the internal dynamics of loose and compact clusters differ fundamentally.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.