Paper detail

The existential fragment of S1S over element and successor is the co-Buchi languages

Buchi's theorem, in establishing the equivalence between languages definable in S1S over element and < and the omega-regular languages also demonstrated that S1S over element and < is no more expressive than its existential fragment. It is also easy to see that S1S over element and < is equi-expressive with S1S over element and successor. However, it is not immediately obvious whether it is possible to adapt Buchi's argument to establish equivalence between expressivity in S1S over element and successor and its existential fragment. In this paper we show that it is not: the existential fragment of S1S over element and successor is strictly less expressive, and is in fact equivalent to the co-Buchi languages.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.