Paper detail

The excursion set approach in non-Gaussian random fields

Insight into a number of interesting questions in cosmology can be obtained from the first crossing distributions of physically motivated barriers by random walks with correlated steps. We write the first crossing distribution as a formal series, ordered by the number of times a walk upcrosses the barrier. Since the fraction of walks with many upcrossings is negligible if the walk has not taken many steps, the leading order term in this series is the most relevant for understanding the massive objects of most interest in cosmology. This first term only requires knowledge of the bivariate distribution of the walk height and slope, and provides an excellent approximation to the first crossing distribution for all barriers and smoothing filters of current interest. We show that this simplicity survives when extending the approach to the case of non-Gaussian random fields. For non-Gaussian fields which are obtained by deterministic transformations of a Gaussian, the first crossing distribution is simply related to that for Gaussian walks crossing a suitably rescaled barrier. Our analysis shows that this is a useful way to think of the generic case as well. Although our study is motivated by the possibility that the primordial fluctuation field was non-Gaussian, our results are general. In particular, they do not assume the non-Gaussianity is small, so they may be viewed as the solution to an excursion set analysis of the late-time, nonlinear fluctuation field rather than the initial one. They are also useful for models in which the barrier height is determined by quantities other than the initial density, since most other physically motivated variables (such as the shear) are usually stochastic and non-Gaussian. We use the Lognormal transformation to illustrate some of our arguments.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.