Paper detail

The evolution of virulence in RNA viruses under a competition-colonization trade-off

RNA viruses exist in large intra-host populations which display great genotypic and phenotypic diversity. We analyze a model of viral competition between two different viral strains infecting a constantly replenished cell pool, in which we assume a trade-off between the virus' colonization skills (cell killing ability or virulence) and its local competition skills (replication performance within coinfected cells). We characterize the conditions that allow for viral spread by means of the basic reproductive number and show that a local coexistence equilibrium exists, which is asymptotically stable. At this equilibrium, the less virulent competitor has a reproductive advantage over the more virulent colonizer. The equilibria at which one strain outcompetes the other one are unstable, i.e., a second viral strain is always able to permanently invade. One generalization of the model is to consider multiple viral strains, each one displaying a different virulence. However, to account for the large phenotypic diversity in viral populations, we consider a continuous spectrum of virulences and present a continuum limit of this multiple viral strains model that describes the time evolution of an initial continuous distribution of virulence. We provide a proof of the existence of solutions of the model's equations and present numerical approximations of solutions for different initial distributions. Our simulations suggest that initial continuous distributions of virulence evolve towards a stationary distribution that is extremely skewed in favor of competitors. Consequently, collective virulence attenuation takes place. This finding may contribute to understanding the phenomenon of virulence attenuation, which has been reported in previous experimental studies.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.