Paper detail

The evolution of turbulent galactic discs: gravitational instability, feedback and accretion

We study the driving of turbulence in star-froming disc galaxies of different masses at different epochs, using an analytic "bathtub" model. The disc of gas and stars is assumed to be in marginal Toomre instability. Turbulence is assumed to be sustained via an energy balance between its dissipation and three simultaneous energy sources. These are stellar feedback, inward transport due to disc instability and clumpy accretion via streams. The transport rate is computed with two different formalisms, with similar results. To achieve the energy balance, the disc self-regulates either the mass fraction in clumps or the turbulent viscous torque parameter. In this version of the model, the efficiency by which the stream kinetic energy is converted into turbulence is a free parameter, $ξ_a$. We find that the contributions of the three energy sources are in the same ball park, within a factor of $\sim\!2$ in all discs at all times. In haloes that evolve to a mass $\leq 10^{12}\,\Msun$ by $z=0$ ($\leq 10^{11.5}\,\Msun$ at $z\!\sim\!2$), feedback is the main driver throughout their lifetimes. Above this mass, the main driver is either transport or accretion for very low or very high values of $ξ_a$, respectively. For an assumed $ξ_a(t)$ that declines in time, galaxies in halos with present-day mass $>\!10^{12}$ M$_\odot$ make a transition from accretion to transport dominance at intermediate redshifts, $z\! \sim\!3$, when their mass was $\geq\!10^{11.5}\,\Msun$. The predicted relation between star-formation rate and gas velocity dispersion is consistent with observations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.