Paper detail

The evolution of the surface brightness of a star cluster as a result of residual star-forming gas expulsion

Direct N-body calculations are presented of the early evolution of exposed clusters to quantify the influence of gas expulsion on the time-varying surface brightness. By assuming that the embedded OB stars drive out most of the gas after a given time delay, the change of the surface brightness of expanding star clusters is studied. The influence of stellar dynamics and stellar evolution is discussed. The growth of the core radii of such models shows a remarkable core re-virialisation. The decrease of the surface mass density during gas expulsion is large and is only truncated by this re-virialisation process. However, the surface brightness within a certain radius does not increase noticeably. Thus, an embedded star cluster cannot reappear in observational surveys after re-virialisation. This finding has a bearing on the observed infant mortality fraction.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.