Paper detail

The evolution of the morphological scale of early-type galaxies since z=2

We present the morphological analysis based on HST-NICMOS observations in the F160W filter of a sample of 30 early-type galaxies spectroscopically confirmed at 1.2<z<2. We derive the effective radius R_e and the mean surface brightness mu_e of galaxies in the rest-frame R-band. We find that early-types at z~1.5 are characterized by a surface brightness (SB) much higher then their local counterparts with comparable R_e. In particular, we find that the mean SB of these early-types should get fainter by ~2.5 mag from z~1.5 to z=0 to match the SB of the local early-types with comparable R_e. This evolution exceeds by a factor two the luminosity evolution expected for early-types in this redshift range and more than a factor three the one derived from the observed luminosity function of galaxies. Consequently, an evolution of the effective radius R_e from the epoch of their formation towards z=0 has to be invoked and the hypothesis of fixed size rejected.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.