Paper detail

The evolution of the mass-size relation to z=3.5 for UV-bright galaxies and sub-mm galaxies in the GOODS-NORTH field

We study the evolution of the size - stellar mass relation for a large spectroscopic sample of galaxies in the GOODs North field up to $z \sim 3.5$. The sizes of the galaxies are measured from $\textit{K}_{s}$-band images (corresponding to rest-frame optical/NIR) from the Subaru 8m telescope. We reproduce earlier results based on photometric redshifts that the sizes of galaxies at a given mass evolve with redshift. Specifically, we compare sizes of UV-bright galaxies at a range of redshifts: Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) selected through the U-drop technique ($z \sim 2.5-3.5$), BM/BX galaxies at $z \sim 1.5-2.5$, and GALEX LBGs at low redshift ($z \sim 0.6-1.5$). The median sizes of these UV-bright galaxies evolve as $(1+z)^{-1.11\pm0.13}$ between $z \sim 0.5-3.5$. The UV-bright galaxies are significantly larger than quiescent galaxies at the same mass and redshift by $0.45\pm0.09$ dex. We also verify the correlation between color and stellar mass density of galaxies to high redshifts. The sizes of sub-mm galaxies in the same field are measured and compared with BM/BX galaxies. We find that median half-light radii of SMGs is $2.90 \pm 0.45$ kpc and there is little difference in their size distribution to the UV-bright star forming galaxies.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.