Paper detail

The evolution of the Compton thick fraction and the nature of obscuration for AGN in the Chandra Deep Field South

(Abridged) We present the results from the X-ray spectral analysis of high-z AGN in the CDFS, making use of the new 4Ms data set and new X-ray spectral models from Brightman & Nandra, which account for Compton scattering and the geometry of the circumnuclear material. Our goals are to ascertain to what extent the torus paradigm of local AGN is applicable at earlier epochs and to evaluate the evolution of the Compton thick fraction (f_CT) with z, important for XRB synthesis models and understanding the accretion history of the universe. In addition to the torus models, we measure the fraction of scattered nuclear light, f_scatt known to be dependant on covering factor of the circumnuclear materal, and use this to aid in our understanding of its geometry. We find that the covering factor of the circumnuclear material is correlated with NH, and as such the most heavily obscured AGN are in fact also the most geometrically buried. We come to these conclusions from the result that f_scatt decreases as NH increases and from the prevalence of the torus model with the smallest opening angle as best fit model in the fits to the most obscured AGN. We find that a significant fraction of sources (~ 20%) in the CDFS are likely to be buried in material with close to 4 pi coverage having been best fit by the torus model with a 0\degree opening angle. Furthermore, we find 41 CTAGN in the CDFS using the new torus models, 29 of which we report here for the first time. We bin our sample by z in order to investigate the evolution of f_CT. Once we have accounted for biases and incompleteness we find a significant increase in the intrinsic f_CT, normalised to LX= 10^43.5 erg/s, from \approx 20% in the local universe to \approx 40% at z=1-4.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.