Paper detail

The evolution of single B-type stars with a large angular momentum content

The database of intermediate mass rotating stellar models presented in the past years by the Geneva Stellar Evolution Group can be used to build synthetic stellar populations that fully account for the effects of stellar rotation. However, up to now we still lacked stellar evolutionary tracks that rotate close to the critical limit during the whole MS phase. This occurs because the flat internal profile of rotation imposed at the Zero-Age MS (ZAMS) is modified by the action of meridional currents immediately after the ZAMS, causing the surface rotational velocity to decrease abruptly until it reaches a quasi-stationary state. We compute stellar models with non-solid rotation at the ZAMS to obtain stellar evolutionary tracks with a larger content of angular momentum, that attain rotational equatorial velocities close to the critical limit throughout their MS phase. These models have a longer MS lifetime and a higher surface chemical enrichment already at the end of the MS, particularly at Z=0.002. Stellar models with solid rotation at the ZAMS adequately represent the overall characteristics and evolution of differentially rotating models of identical angular momentum content, but with a lower initial surface rotational velocity. For these models we recommend to use as the initial rotational rate the values derived once the quasi-stationary state is reached, after the abrupt decrease in surface velocity. Interestingly, the initial equatorial rotational velocities are virtually metallicity independent for the stellar models we computed with the same mass and angular momentum content at the ZAMS. If, as some observational evidence indicates, B-type stars at Z=0.002 rotate with a higher equatorial velocity at the ZAMS than stars with Z=0.014, our finding would indicate that the angular momentum content of B-type stars in the SMC is higher than their Galactic counterparts.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.