Paper detail

The evolution of planetary nebulae VI. On the chemical composition of the metal-poor PN G135.9+55.9

The actual value of the oxygen abundance of the metal-poor planetary nebula PN G135.9+55.9 has frequently been debated in the literature. We wanted to clarify the situation by making an improved abundance determination based on a study that includes both new accurate observations and new models. We made observations using the method of integral field spectroscopy with the PMAS instrument, and also used ultraviolet observations that were measured with HST-STIS. In our interpretation of the reduced and calibrated spectrum we used for the first time, recent radiation hydrodynamic models, which were calculated with several setups of scaled values of mean Galactic disk planetary nebula metallicities. For evolved planetary nebulae, such as PN G135.9+55.9, it turns out that departures from thermal equilibrium can be significant, leading to much lower electron temperatures, hence weaker emission in collisionally excited lines. Based on our time-dependent hydrodynamic models and the observed emission line [OIII]5007, we found a very low oxygen content of about 1/80 of the mean Galactic disk value. This result is consistent with emission line measurements in the ultraviolet wavelength range. The C/O and Ne/O ratios are unusually high and similar to those of another halo object, BoBn-1.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.