Paper detail

The evolution of obscured accretion

Our current understanding of the evolution of obscured accretion onto supermassive black holes is reviewed. We consider the literature results on the relation between the fraction of moderately obscured, Compton-thin AGN and redshift, and discuss the biases which possibly affect the various measurements. Then, we discuss a number of methods - from ultradeep X-ray observations to the detection of high-ionization optical emission lines - to select the population of the most heavily obscured, Compton-thick AGN, whose cosmological evolution is basically unknown. The space density of heavily obscured AGN measured through different techniques is discussed and compared with the predictions by current synthesis models of the X-ray background. Preliminary results from the first half of the 3 Ms XMM observation of the Chandra Deep Field South (CDFS) are also presented. The prospects for population studies of heavily obscured AGN with future planned or proposed X-ray missions are finally discussed.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.