Paper detail

The Evolution of Molecular Gas Fraction Traced by the CO Tully-Fisher Relation

Carbon monoxide (CO) observations show a luminosity$-$line-width correlation that evolves with redshift. We present a method to use CO measurements alone to infer the molecular gas fraction ($f_{\rm mol}$) and constrain the CO$-$H$_2$ conversion factor ($α_{\rm CO}$). We compile from the literature spatially integrated low-$J$ CO observations of six galaxy populations, including a total of 449 galaxies between $0.01 \leq z \leq 3.26$. The CO data of each population provide an estimate of the $α_{\rm CO}$-normalized mean molecular gas fraction ($f_{\rm mol}/α_{\rm CO}$). The redshift evolution of the luminosity$-$line-width correlation thus indicates an evolution of $f_{\rm mol}/α_{\rm CO}$. We use a Bayesian-based Monte-Carlo Markov Chain sampler to derive the posterior probability distribution functions of $f_{\rm mol}/α_{\rm CO}$ for these galaxy populations, accounting for random inclination angles and measurement errors in the likelihood function. We find that the molecular gas fraction evolves rapidly with redshift, $f_{\rm mol} \propto (1+z)^β$ with $β\simeq 2$, for both normal star-forming and starburst galaxies. Furthermore, the evolution trend agrees well with that inferred from the Kennicutt-Schmidt relation and the star-forming main sequence. Finally, at $z < 0.1$ normal star-forming galaxies require a $\sim5\times$ larger $α_{\rm CO}$ than starburst galaxies to match their molecular gas fractions, but at $z > 1$ both star-forming types exhibit sub-Galactic $α_{\rm CO}$ values and normal star-forming galaxies appear more gas-rich than starbursts. Future applications of this method include calibrating Tully-Fisher relations without inclination correction and inferring the evolution of the atomic gas fraction with HI observations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.