Paper detail

The evolution of mass profiles of galaxy clusters

We determine the average mass profile of galaxy clusters at two different redshifts and compare its evolution with cosmological model predictions. We use two samples of galaxy clusters spanning similar (evolutionary corrected) mass ranges at different redshifts. The sample of low-redshift (z ~ 0.0-0.1) clusters is extracted from the ESO Nearby Abell Cluster Survey (ENACS) catalog. The sample of high-redshift (z ~ 0.4-0.8) clusters is mostly made of clusters from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey (EDisCS). We determine the average mass-profiles for these two cluster samples by solving the Jeans equation for hydrostatic equilibrium, using galaxies as tracers. By using two cluster galaxy populations, characterized by the presence and, respectively, absence of emission-lines in their spectra ('ELGs' and 'nELGs' hereafter), we are able to partially break the mass-profile orbital-anisotropy degeneracy. We find that the mass-profiles of both the nearby and the distant clusters are reasonably well fitted by a Navarro, Frenk and White (NFW) model. The best-fit values of the NFW concentration parameter are as predicted by cosmological numerical simulations; cluster mass-density profiles become more concentrated with time. The evolution of the number-density profile of nELGs proceeds in the opposite sense, becoming less concentrated with time. In our analysis we also recover the orbital anisotropy of nELGs and ELGs . We find that in low-z clusters nELGs follow almost isotropic orbits and ELGs have more radially-elongated orbits. In high-z clusters both nELGs and ELGs follow radially-elongated orbits. We discuss these results in terms of the predicted secular mass growth of galaxy clusters and the transformation of ELGs into nELGs.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.