Paper detail

The Evolution of K* and the Halo Occupation Distribution since z=1.5: Observations vs. Simulations

We study the evolution of the K-band luminosity function (LF) and the Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) using Subaru observations of 15 X-ray clusters at z=0.8-1.5 and compare the results with mock clusters (0<z<1.3) extracted from the Millennium Simulation and populated with galaxies using the semi-analytic model (SAM) of Bower et al., matched in mass to our observed sample. We find that the characteristic luminosity K* defined by a Shechter LF is consistent with SAM predictions, which mimic well the evolution of K* in z>1 rich clusters. However, we cannot distinguish between this model and a simple stellar population synthesis model invoking passive evolution with a formation redshift z~5 - consistent with the presence of an old red galaxy population ubiquitous in rich clusters at z=1.5. We also see a small difference (ΔK*~0.5) between our clusters and studies of the field population at similar redshifts, suggesting only a weak dependence of the luminous (L>L*) part of the LF on environment. Turning to our HOD study, we find that within R_{500}, high-z clusters tend to host smaller numbers of galaxies to a magnitude K*+2 compared to their low-z counterparts. This behavior is also seen in the mock samples and is relatively insensitive to the average mass of the cluster haloes. In particular, we find significant correlations of the observed number of member cluster galaxies (N) with both z and cluster mass: $N(M,z)=(53\pm1)(1+z)^{-0.61^{+0.18}_{-0.20}}(M/10^{14.3})^{0.86\pm0.05}$. Finally, we examine the spatial distribution of galaxies and provide a new estimate of the concentration parameter for clusters at high z ($c_{g}=2.8^{+1.0}_{-0.8}$). Our result is consistent with predictions from both our SAM mock clusters and literature's predictions for dark matter haloes. The mock sample predictions rise slowly with decreasing redshift reaching $c_{g}=6.3^{+0.39}_{-0.36}$ at z=0.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.