Paper detail

The evolution of dusty torus covering factor in quasars

We have assembled a large sample of 5996 quasars at redshift 2.0=< z <= 2.4 (high-z) or 0.7=< z <= 1.1 (low-z) from SDSS data release nine and seven quasar catalogs. The spectral energy distribution (SED) of quasars were constructed by collecting WISE, UKIDSS, and GALEX photometric data in addition to SDSS, from which the IR luminosity at 1-7 μm and bolometric luminosity at 1100 Å- 1 μm were calculated. A red tail is clearly seen in the distributions of the spectral index in 1100 Å- 1 μm both for high-z and low-z sources, which is likely due to red or reddened quasars. The covering factor of dusty torus is estimated as the ratio of the IR luminosity to the bolometric luminosity. We found significant anti-correlations between the covering factor and bolometric luminosity, in both high-z and low-z quasars, however they follow different tracks. At overlapped bolometric luminosity, the covering factor of high-z quasars are systematically larger than those of low-z quasars, implying an evolution of covering factor with redshift.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.