Paper detail

The evolution of AGN across cosmic time: what is downsizing?

We use a coupled model of the formation and evolution of galaxies and black holes (BH) to study the evolution of active galactic nuclei (AGN) in a cold dark matter universe. The model predicts the BH mass, spin and mass accretion history. BH mass grows via accretion triggered by discs becoming dynamically unstable or galaxy mergers (called the starburst mode) and accretion from quasi-hydrostatic hot gas haloes (called the hot-halo mode). By taking into account AGN obscuration, we obtain a very good fit to the observed luminosity functions (LF) of AGN (optical, soft and hard X-ray, and bolometric) for a wide range of redshifts (0<z<6). The model predicts a hierarchical build up of BH mass, with the typical mass of actively growing BHs increasing with decreasing redshift. Remarkably, despite this, we find downsizing in the AGN population, in terms of the differential growth with redshift of the space density of faint and bright AGN. This arises naturally from the interplay between the starburst and hot-halo accretion modes. The faint end of the LF is dominated by massive BHs experiencing quiescent accretion via a thick disc, primarily during the hot-halo mode. The bright end of the LF, on the other hand, is dominated by AGN which host BHs accreting close to or in excess of the Eddington limit during the starburst mode. The model predicts that the comoving space density of AGN peaks at z~3, similar to the star formation history. However, when taking into account obscuration, the space density of faint AGN peaks at lower redshift (z<2) than that of bright AGN (z~2-3). This implies that the cosmic evolution of AGN is shaped in part by obscuration.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.